Commit graph

1129 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gusted
c1b37b7fda
[MODERATION] User blocking
- Add the ability to block a user via their profile page.
- This will unstar their repositories and visa versa.
- Blocked users cannot create issues or pull requests on your the doer's repositories (mind that this is not the case for organizations).
- Blocked users cannot comment on the doer's opened issues or pull requests.
- Blocked users cannot add reactions to doer's comments.
- Blocked users cannot cause a notification trough mentioning the doer.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/540
(cherry picked from commit 687d852480)
(cherry picked from commit 0c32a4fde5)
(cherry picked from commit 1791130e3c)
(cherry picked from commit 37858b7e8f)
(cherry picked from commit a3e2bfd7e9)
(cherry picked from commit 7009b9fe87)

Conflicts: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1014
        routers/web/user/profile.go
        templates/user/profile.tmpl
(cherry picked from commit b2aec34791)
(cherry picked from commit e2f1b73752)

[MODERATION] organization blocking a user (#802)

- Resolves #476
- Follow up for: #540
- Ensure that the doer and blocked person cannot follow each other.
- Ensure that the block person cannot watch doer's repositories.
- Add unblock button to the blocked user list.
- Add blocked since information to the blocked user list.
- Add extra testing to moderation code.
- Blocked user will unwatch doer's owned repository upon blocking.
- Add flash messages to let the user know the block/unblock action was successful.
- Add "You haven't blocked any users" message.
- Add organization blocking a user.

Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/802
(cherry picked from commit 0505a10421)
(cherry picked from commit 37b4e6ef9b)
(cherry picked from commit c17c121f2c)

[MODERATION] organization blocking a user (#802) (squash)

Changes to adapt to:

  6bbccdd177 Improve AJAX link and modal confirm dialog (#25210)

Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/882/files#issuecomment-945962
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/882#issue-330561
(cherry picked from commit 523635f83c)
(cherry picked from commit 4743eaa6a0)
(cherry picked from commit eff5b43d2e)

Conflicts: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1014
        routers/web/user/profile.go
(cherry picked from commit 9d359be5ed)
(cherry picked from commit b1f3069a22)

[MODERATION] add user blocking API

- Follow up for: #540, #802
- Add API routes for user blocking from user and organization
perspective.
- The new routes have integration testing.
- The new model functions have unit tests.
- Actually quite boring to write and to read this pull request.

(cherry picked from commit f3afaf15c7)
(cherry picked from commit 6d754db3e5)
(cherry picked from commit 2a89ddc0ac)
(cherry picked from commit 4a147bff7e)

Conflicts:
        routers/api/v1/api.go
        templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl
(cherry picked from commit bb8c339185)
(cherry picked from commit 5a11569a01)
(cherry picked from commit 2373c801ee)

[MODERATION] restore redirect on unblock

 ctx.RedirectToFirst(ctx.FormString("redirect_to"), ctx.ContextUser.HomeLink())

was replaced by

 ctx.JSONOK()

in 128d77a3a Following up fixes for "Fix inconsistent user profile layout across tabs" (#25739)

thus changing the behavior (nicely spotted by the tests). This
restores it.

(cherry picked from commit 597c243707)
(cherry picked from commit cfa539e590)

[MODERATION] Add test case (squash)

- Add an test case, to test an property of the function.

(cherry picked from commit 70dadb1916)

[MODERATION] Block adding collaborators

- Ensure that the doer and blocked user cannot add each other as
collaborators to repositories.
- The Web UI gets an detailed message of the specific situation, the API
gets an generic Forbidden code.
- Unit tests has been added.
- Integration testing for Web and API has been added.
- This commit doesn't introduce removing each other as collaborators on
the block action, due to the complexity of database calls that needs to
be figured out. That deserves its own commit and test code.

(cherry picked from commit 747be949a1)

[MODERATION] move locale_en-US.ini strings to avoid conflicts

Conflicts:
        web_src/css/org.css
        web_src/css/user.css
        https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1180

(cherry picked from commit e53f955c88)

Conflicts:
        services/issue/comments.go
        https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1212
(cherry picked from commit b4a454b576)

Conflicts:
        models/forgejo_migrations/migrate.go
        options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
        services/pull/pull.go
        https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1264

[MODERATION] Remove blocked user collaborations with doer

- When the doer blocks an user, who is also an collaborator on an
repository that the doer owns, remove that collaboration.
- Added unit tests.
- Refactor the unit test to be more organized.

(cherry picked from commit ec87016178)
(cherry picked from commit 313e6174d8)

[MODERATION] QoL improvements (squash)

- Ensure that organisations cannot be blocked. It currently has no
effect, as all blocked operations cannot be executed from an
organisation standpoint.
- Refactored the API route to make use of the `UserAssignmentAPI`
middleware.
- Make more use of `t.Run` so that the test code is more clear about
which block of code belongs to which test case.
- Added more integration testing (to ensure the organisations cannot be
blocked and some authorization/permission checks).

(cherry picked from commit e9d638d075)

[MODERATION] s/{{avatar/{{ctx.AvatarUtils.Avatar/

(cherry picked from commit ce8b30be13)
(cherry picked from commit f911dc4025)

Conflicts:
	options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1354
2023-08-29 10:03:29 +02:00
fluzz
d52f4eea44
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.

A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.

That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.

A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.

(cherry picked from commit c524d33402)

Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go

That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.

(cherry picked from commit f061caa655)

Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.

(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f5)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca)

Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a2)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation

The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition

The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.

(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fd)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d3)

Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit da932152f1)

Pettier code to set the update time of comments

Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)

XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.

(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808d)

Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.

When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.

This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.

(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e)

Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests

Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.

The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c55)
2023-08-29 08:51:45 +02:00
Bo-Yi Wu
8cd46024fd
refactor(API): refactor secret creation and update functionality (#26751)
According to the GitHub API Spec:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-or-update-an-organization-secret

Merge the Create and Update secret into a single API.

- Remove the `CreateSecretOption` struct and replace it with
`CreateOrUpdateSecretOption` in `modules/structs/secret.go`
- Update the `CreateOrUpdateOrgSecret` function in
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go` to use `CreateOrUpdateSecretOption`
instead of `UpdateSecretOption`
- Remove the `CreateOrgSecret` function in
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go` and replace it with
`CreateOrUpdateOrgSecret`
- Update the Swagger documentation in
`routers/api/v1/swagger/options.go` and `templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl`
to reflect the changes in the struct names and function names

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 13:08:19 +08:00
Chongyi Zheng
43652746f2
Move modules/mirror to services (#26737)
To solve the cyclic imports in a better way

Closes #20261
2023-08-27 10:24:45 +08:00
Infinoid
86ee5b4b1b
PATCH branch-protection updates check list even when checks are disabled (#26351)
Fixes: #26333.

Previously, this endpoint only updates the `StatusCheckContexts` field
when `EnableStatusCheck==true`, which makes it impossible to clear the
array otherwise.

This patch uses slice `nil`-ness to decide whether to update the list of
checks. The field is ignored when either the client explicitly passes in
a null, or just omits the field from the json ([which causes
`json.Unmarshal` to leave the struct field
unchanged](https://go.dev/play/p/Z2XHOILuB1Q)). I think this is a better
measure of intent than whether the `EnableStatusCheck` flag was set,
because it matches the semantics of other field types.

Also adds a test case. I noticed that [`testAPIEditBranchProtection`
only checks the branch
name](c1c83dbaec/tests/integration/api_branch_test.go (L68))
and no other fields, so I added some extra `GET` calls and specific
checks to make sure the fields are changing properly.

I added those checks the existing integration test; is that the right
place for it?
2023-08-24 05:36:04 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
b62c8e7765
feat(API): update and delete secret for managing organization secrets (#26660)
- Add `UpdateSecret` function to modify org or user repo secret
- Add `DeleteSecret` function to delete secret from an organization
- Add `UpdateSecretOption` struct for updating secret options
- Add `UpdateOrgSecret` function to update a secret in an organization
- Add `DeleteOrgSecret` function to delete a secret in an organization

GitHub API

1. Update Org Secret:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-or-update-an-organization-secret
2. Delete Org Secret:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#delete-an-organization-secret

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-08-24 02:07:00 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
23addde28e
feat: implement organization secret creation API (#26566)
- Add a new `CreateSecretOption` struct for creating secrets
- Implement a `CreateOrgSecret` function to create a secret in an
organization
- Add a new route in `api.go` to handle the creation of organization
secrets
- Update the Swagger template to include the new `CreateOrgSecret` API
endpoint

---------

Signed-off-by: appleboy <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-08-22 11:20:34 +08:00
Jason Song
b658f2c61b
Return empty when searching issues with no repos (#26545) 2023-08-17 12:42:17 -05:00
Bo-Yi Wu
79d74d208f
Add API route to list org secrets (#26485)
- Add a new function `CountOrgSecrets` in the file
`models/secret/secret.go`
- Add a new file `modules/structs/secret.go`
- Add a new function `ListActionsSecrets` in the file
`routers/api/v1/api.go`
- Add a new file `routers/api/v1/org/action.go`
- Add a new function `listActionsSecrets` in the file
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go`

go-sdk: https://gitea.com/gitea/go-sdk/pulls/629

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-15 14:32:43 +02:00
puni9869
cafce3b4b5
Allow to archive labels (#26478)
## Archived labels 

This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.

## Changes

1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB

## Outsourced for the future

There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.

## Screenshots

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/208f95cd-42e4-4ed7-9a1f-cd2050a645d4)

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/746428e0-40bb-45b3-b992-85602feb371d)

Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-08-14 11:56:14 +02:00
wxiaoguang
c2e0143bfe
Introduce ctx.PathParamRaw to avoid incorrect unescaping (#26392)
Fix #26389

And complete an old TODO: `ctx.Params does un-escaping,..., which is
incorrect.`
2023-08-09 14:57:45 +08:00
Jason Song
1e76a824bc
Refactor and enhance issue indexer to support both searching, filtering and paging (#26012)
Fix #24662.

Replace #24822 and #25708 (although it has been merged)


## Background

In the past, Gitea supported issue searching with a keyword and
conditions in a less efficient way. It worked by searching for issues
with the keyword and obtaining limited IDs (as it is heavy to get all)
on the indexer (bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch), and then querying with
conditions on the database to find a subset of the found IDs. This is
why the results could be incomplete.

To solve this issue, we need to store all fields that could be used as
conditions in the indexer and support both keyword and additional
conditions when searching with the indexer.

## Major changes

- Redefine `IndexerData` to include all fields that could be used as
filter conditions.
- Refactor `Search(ctx context.Context, kw string, repoIDs []int64,
limit, start int, state string)` to `Search(ctx context.Context, options
*SearchOptions)`, so it supports more conditions now.
- Change the data type stored in `issueIndexerQueue`. Use
`IndexerMetadata` instead of `IndexerData` in case the data has been
updated while it is in the queue. This also reduces the storage size of
the queue.
- Enhance searching with Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch, make them
fully support `SearchOptions`. Also, update the data versions.
- Keep most logic of database indexer, but remove
`issues.SearchIssueIDsByKeyword` in `models` to avoid confusion where is
the entry point to search issues.
- Start a Meilisearch instance to test it in unit tests.
- Add unit tests with almost full coverage to test
Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch indexer.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-07-31 06:28:53 +00:00
wxiaoguang
915cdf8f87
Remove "misc" scope check from public API endpoints (#26134)
Fix #26035
2023-07-26 02:53:31 +00:00
JakobDev
6598d0291c
Allow Organisations to have a E-Mail (#25082)
Resolves #25057

This adds a E-Mail field to Organisations. The E-Mail is just shown on
the Profile when it is visited by a logged in User. The E-mail is not
used for something else.

**Screenshots:**

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15185051/a8d622b3-7278-4c08-984b-9c5ebfdb5471)

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15185051/6dcb1dd7-d04b-49eb-bc96-6582cfe9757b)

---------

Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <privat@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-25 08:26:27 +00:00
caicandong
4211efe8b7
fix Missing 404 swagger response docs for /admin/users/{username} (#26086)
close #26079
2023-07-24 10:48:44 +02:00
delvh
f3d41c61eb
Remove db.DefaultContext in routers/ and cmd/ (#26076)
Now, the only remaining usages of `models.db.DefaultContext` are in
  - `modules`
  - `models`
  - `services`
2023-07-23 23:47:27 -04:00
Lunny Xiao
b167f35113
Add context parameter to some database functions (#26055)
To avoid deadlock problem, almost database related functions should be
have ctx as the first parameter.
This PR do a refactor for some of these functions.
2023-07-22 22:14:27 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
037c9895a7
Support copy protected branch from template repository (#25889)
Fix #14303
2023-07-21 12:32:47 +08:00
wxiaoguang
236c645bf1
Refactor "Content" for file uploading (#25851)
Before: the concept "Content string" is used everywhere. It has some
problems:

1. Sometimes it means "base64 encoded content", sometimes it means "raw
binary content"
2. It doesn't work with large files, eg: uploading a 1G LFS file would
make Gitea process OOM

This PR does the refactoring: use "ContentReader" / "ContentBase64"
instead of "Content"

This PR is not breaking because the key in API JSON is still "content":
`` ContentBase64 string `json:"content"` ``
2023-07-18 18:14:47 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
0fd1672ae4
For API attachments, use API URL (#25639)
Fix #25257

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-10 09:31:19 +00:00
silverwind
887a683af9
Update tool dependencies, lock govulncheck and actionlint (#25655)
- Update all tool dependencies
- Lock `govulncheck` and `actionlint` to their latest tags

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <m.huber@kithara.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-07-09 11:58:06 +00:00
techknowlogick
cb01b8691d
Add open/closed field support for issue index (#25708)
A couple of notes:
* Future changes should refactor arguments into a struct
* This filtering only is supported by meilisearch right now
* Issue index number is bumped which will cause a re-index
2023-07-07 17:10:13 +00:00
6543
8995046110
Less naked returns (#25713)
just a step towards  #25655

and some related refactoring
2023-07-07 05:31:56 +00:00
silverwind
88f835192d
Replace interface{} with any (#25686)
Result of running `perl -p -i -e 's#interface\{\}#any#g' **/*` and `make fmt`.

Basically the same [as golang did](2580d0e08d).
2023-07-04 18:36:08 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
de981c39e6
Fix bug of branches API with tests (#25578)
Fix #25558
Extract from #22743

This PR added a repository's check when creating/deleting branches via
API. Mirror repository and archive repository cannot do that.
2023-07-01 10:52:52 +08:00
JakobDev
254a82842a
Add API for changing Avatars (#25369)
This adds an API for uploading and Deleting Avatars for of Users, Repos
and Organisations. I'm not sure, if this should also be added to the
Admin API.

Resolves #25344

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-29 23:22:55 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
6e19484f4d
Sync branches into databases (#22743)
Related #14180
Related #25233 
Related #22639
Close #19786
Related #12763 

This PR will change all the branches retrieve method from reading git
data to read database to reduce git read operations.

- [x] Sync git branches information into database when push git data
- [x] Create a new table `Branch`, merge some columns of `DeletedBranch`
into `Branch` table and drop the table `DeletedBranch`.
- [x] Read `Branch` table when visit `code` -> `branch` page
- [x] Read `Branch` table when list branch names in `code` page dropdown
- [x] Read `Branch` table when list git ref compare page
- [x] Provide a button in admin page to manually sync all branches.
- [x] Sync branches if repository is not empty but database branches are
empty when visiting pages with branches list
- [x] Use `commit_time desc` as the default FindBranch order by to keep
consistent as before and deleted branches will be always at the end.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-06-29 10:03:20 +00:00
Georg Dangl
9538842364
Use correct response code in push mirror creation response in v1_json.tmpl (#25476)
In the process of doing a bit of automation via the API, we've
discovered a _small_ issue in the Swagger definition. We tried to create
a push mirror for a repository, but our generated client raised an
exception due to an unexpected status code.

When looking at this function:

3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L236-L240)

We see it defines `201 - Created` as response:

3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L260-L262)

But it actually returns `200 - OK`:

3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L373)

So I've just updated the Swagger definitions to match the code😀

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-28 22:00:19 +00:00
Zettat123
defd807073
Fix bugs related to notification endpoints (#25548) 2023-06-28 10:26:56 -04:00
Jason Song
174213530d
Fix Permission in API returned repository struct (#25388)
The old code generates `structs.Repository.Permissions` with only
`access.Permission.AccessMode`, however, it should check the units too,
or the value could be incorrect. For example,
`structs.Repository.Permissions.Push` could be false even the doer has
write access to code unit.

Should fix
https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/issues/14059#issuecomment-1047961128
(Not reported by it, I just found it when I was looking into this bug)

---

Review tips:

The major changes are
- `modules/structs/repo.go`
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25388/files#diff-870406f6857117f8b03611c43fca0ab9ed6d6e76a2d0069a7c1f17e8fa9092f7
- `services/convert/repository.go`
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25388/files#diff-7736f6d2ae894c9edb7729a80ab89aa183b888a26a811a0c1fdebd18726a7101

And other changes are passive.
2023-06-22 13:08:08 +00:00
wxiaoguang
4e2f1ee58d
Refactor web package and context package (#25298)
1. The "web" package shouldn't depends on "modules/context" package,
instead, let each "web context" register themselves to the "web"
package.
2. The old Init/Free doesn't make sense, so simplify it
* The ctx in "Init(ctx)" is never used, and shouldn't be used that way
* The "Free" is never called and shouldn't be called because the SSPI
instance is shared

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-18 09:59:09 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
d6dd6d641b
Fix all possible setting error related storages and added some tests (#23911)
Follow up #22405

Fix #20703 

This PR rewrites storage configuration read sequences with some breaks
and tests. It becomes more strict than before and also fixed some
inherit problems.

- Move storage's MinioConfig struct into setting, so after the
configuration loading, the values will be stored into the struct but not
still on some section.
- All storages configurations should be stored on one section,
configuration items cannot be overrided by multiple sections. The
prioioty of configuration is `[attachment]` > `[storage.attachments]` |
`[storage.customized]` > `[storage]` > `default`
- For extra override configuration items, currently are `SERVE_DIRECT`,
`MINIO_BASE_PATH`, `MINIO_BUCKET`, which could be configured in another
section. The prioioty of the override configuration is `[attachment]` >
`[storage.attachments]` > `default`.
- Add more tests for storages configurations.
- Update the storage documentations.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-06-14 11:42:38 +08:00
Denys Konovalov
eac1bddb8d
fix swagger documentation for multiple files API endpoint (#25110)
Fixes some issues with the swagger documentation for the new multiple
files API endpoint (#24887) which were overlooked when submitting the
original PR:

1. add some missing parameter descriptions
2. set correct `required` option for required parameters
3. change endpoint description to match it full functionality (every
kind of file modification is supported, not just creating and updating)
2023-06-07 23:49:58 +08:00
Jack Hay
18de83b2a3
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
    - `activitypub`
    - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
    - `misc`
    - `notification`
    - `organization`
    - `package`
    - `issue`
    - `repository`
    - `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
  -  `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
  - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection

### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">

## tokenRequiresScopes  Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error

## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
   -  _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
   - _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
   - _This should be addressed in this PR_
   - For example: 
   ```go
	m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
		m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
		m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
   ```

## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default

Closes #24501
Closes #24799

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
JakobDev
1b115296d3
Followup to pinned Issues (#24945)
This addressees some things from #24406 that came up after the PR was
merged. Mostly from @delvh.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-30 15:26:51 +00:00
Denys Konovalov
275d4b7e3f
API endpoint for changing/creating/deleting multiple files (#24887)
This PR creates an API endpoint for creating/updating/deleting multiple
files in one API call similar to the solution provided by
[GitLab](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/commits.html#create-a-commit-with-multiple-files-and-actions).

To archive this, the CreateOrUpdateRepoFile and DeleteRepoFIle functions
in files service are unified into one function supporting multiple files
and actions.

Resolves #14619
2023-05-29 17:41:35 +08:00
JakobDev
aaa1094663
Add the ability to pin Issues (#24406)
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175.

## Screenshots

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123207-0aa39869-bb48-45c3-abe2-ba1e836046ec.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123297-152a16ea-a857-451d-9a42-61f2cd54dd75.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235640782-cbfe25ec-6254-479a-a3de-133e585d7a2d.png)

The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.

## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.

## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration

**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
谈笑风生间
309354c70e
New webhook trigger for receiving Pull Request review requests (#24481)
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321

Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.

Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.

After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
2023-05-24 22:06:27 -04:00
JakobDev
25dc1556cd
Add API for Label templates (#24602)
This adds API that allows getting the Label templates of the Gitea
Instance
2023-05-23 18:10:23 +08:00
yp05327
bebc3433c5
Add IsErrRepoFilesAlreadyExist check when fork repo (#24678)
Before:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/e9e3de75-eb6e-418e-9227-ef4e5f448a04)
After:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/74b1cd6c-c5b1-4ee0-a1d8-6b3fb8d3a8e9)
2023-05-22 18:21:46 +08:00
KN4CK3R
cdb088cec2
Add CRAN package registry (#22331)
This PR adds a [CRAN](https://cran.r-project.org/) package registry.

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/210450039-d6fa6f77-20cd-4741-89a8-1624def267f7.png)
2023-05-22 10:57:49 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
c59a057297
Refactor rename user and rename organization (#24052)
This PR is a refactor at the beginning. And now it did 4 things.
- [x] Move renaming organizaiton and user logics into services layer and
merged as one function
- [x] Support rename a user capitalization only. For example, rename the
user from `Lunny` to `lunny`. We just need to change one table `user`
and others should not be touched.
- [x] Before this PR, some renaming were missed like `agit`
- [x] Fix bug the API reutrned from `http.StatusNoContent` to `http.StatusOK`
2023-05-21 23:13:47 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
64f6a5d113
Use CommentList instead of []*Comment (#24828)
As title.
2023-05-21 20:48:28 +08:00
Yevhen Pavlov
1dfaf83798
Return 404 in the API if the requested webhooks were not found (#24823)
Should resolve first point of the issue
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24574
2023-05-21 10:54:28 +08:00
wxiaoguang
6b33152b7d
Decouple the different contexts from each other (#24786)
Replace #16455

Close #21803

Mixing different Gitea contexts together causes some problems:

1. Unable to respond proper content when error occurs, eg: Web should
respond HTML while API should respond JSON
2. Unclear dependency, eg: it's unclear when Context is used in
APIContext, which fields should be initialized, which methods are
necessary.


To make things clear, this PR introduces a Base context, it only
provides basic Req/Resp/Data features.

This PR mainly moves code. There are still many legacy problems and
TODOs in code, leave unrelated changes to future PRs.
2023-05-21 09:50:53 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
38cf43d060
Some refactors for issues stats (#24793)
This PR

- [x] Move some functions from `issues.go` to `issue_stats.go` and
`issue_label.go`
- [x] Remove duplicated issue options `UserIssueStatsOption` to keep
only one `IssuesOptions`
2023-05-19 22:17:48 +08:00
KN4CK3R
5968c63a11
Add Go package registry (#24687)
Fixes #7608

This PR adds a Go package registry usable with the Go proxy protocol.

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1666336/328feb5c-3df2-4f9d-8eae-fe3126d14c37)
2023-05-14 23:38:40 +08:00
Yarden Shoham
542adf50d5
Fix organization field being null in GET /api/v1/teams/{id} (#24694)
Enabled the organization loading flag.

- Fixes #20399 

# Before
```json
{
  ...
  "description": "",
  "organization": null,
  "includes_all_repositories": true,
  "permission": "owner",
  ...
}
```

# After
```json
{
  ...
  "description": "",
  "organization": {
    "id": 2,
    "name": "bigorg",
    "full_name": "",
    "avatar_url": "https://3000-yardenshoham-gitea-3gfrlc9gn4h.ws-us96b.gitpod.io/avatars/e2649b0c016d9102664a7d4349503eb9",
    "description": "",
    "website": "",
    "location": "",
    "visibility": "public",
    "repo_admin_change_team_access": true,
    "username": "bigorg"
  },
  "includes_all_repositories": true,
  "permission": "owner",
  ...
}
```

Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-13 14:47:58 +00:00
KN4CK3R
9173e079ae
Add Alpine package registry (#23714)
This PR adds an Alpine package registry. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Creating_an_Alpine_package)
to build a *.apk package for testing.

This functionality is similar to the Debian registry (#22854) and
therefore shares some methods. I marked this PR as blocked because it
should be merged after #22854.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/227779595-b76163aa-eea1-4a79-9583-775c24ad74e8.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-12 17:27:50 +00:00
Matthew Walowski
5930ab5fdf
Filter get single commit (#24613)
Pretty much the same thing as #24568 but for getting a single commit
instead of getting a list of commits
2023-05-10 09:34:07 +08:00