Commit graph

240 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gergely Nagy
2ca4862f8b
[GITEA] Allow changing the repo Wiki branch to main
Previously, the repo wiki was hardcoded to use `master` as its branch,
this change makes it possible to use `main` (or something else, governed
by `[repository].DEFAULT_BRANCH`, a setting that already exists and
defaults to `main`).

The way it is done is that a new column is added to the `repository`
table: `wiki_branch`. The migration will make existing repositories
default to `master`, for compatibility's sake, even if they don't have a
Wiki (because it's easier to do that). Newly created repositories will
default to `[repository].DEFAULT_BRANCH` instead.

The Wiki service was updated to use the branch name stored in the
database, and fall back to the default if it is empty.

Old repositories with Wikis using the older `master` branch will have
the option to do a one-time transition to `main`, available via the
repository settings in the "Danger Zone". This option will only be
available for repositories that have the internal wiki enabled, it is
not empty, and the wiki branch is not `[repository].DEFAULT_BRANCH`.

When migrating a repository with a Wiki, Forgejo will use the same
branch name for the wiki as the source repository did. If that's not the
same as the default, the option to normalize it will be available after
the migration's done.

Additionally, the `/api/v1/{owner}/{repo}` endpoint was updated: it will
now include the wiki branch name in `GET` requests, and allow changing
the wiki branch via `PATCH`.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit d87c526d2a)
2024-02-05 16:57:47 +01:00
Earl Warren
603a44edf0
[GITEA] POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2109
(cherry picked from commit 8b4ba3dce7)
(cherry picked from commit 196edea0f9)

[GITEA] POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments (squash) do not implicitly create a review

If a comment already exists in a review, the comment is added. If it
is the first comment added to a review, it will implicitly create a
new review instead of adding to the existing one.

The pull_service.CreateCodeComment function is responsibe for this
behavior and it will defer to createCodeComment once the review is
determined, either because it was found or because it was created.

Rename createCodeComment into CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID to expose
it and change the API endpoint to use it instead. Since the review is
provided by the user and verified to exist already, there is no need
for the logic implemented by CreateCodeComment.

The tests are modified to remove the initial comment from the fixture
because it was creating the false positive. I was verified to fail
without this fix.

(cherry picked from commit 6a555996dc)
(cherry picked from commit b173a0ccee)
(cherry picked from commit 838ab9740a)
2024-02-05 16:09:42 +01:00
Gergely Nagy
639b428cf4
[FEAT] API support for repository flags
Expose the repository flags feature over the API, so the flags can be
managed by a site administrator without using the web API.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit bac9f0225d)
(cherry picked from commit e7f5c1ba14)
(cherry picked from commit 95d9fe19cf)
(cherry picked from commit 7fc51991e4)
2024-02-05 16:09:42 +01:00
Earl Warren
41871ba3af
[ACTIONS] on.schedule: create a new payload
do not reuse the payload of the event that triggered the creation of
the scheduled event. Create a new one instead that contains no other
information than the event name in the action field ("schedule").

(cherry picked from commit 0b40ca1ea5)
(cherry picked from commit f86487432b)
(cherry picked from commit 4bd5d2e9d0)
(cherry picked from commit d10830e238)
(cherry picked from commit 53f5a3aa91)
(cherry picked from commit 9ed1487b73)
(cherry picked from commit 6a39978851)
2024-02-05 16:09:41 +01:00
Earl Warren
c7a389f2b2
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.

A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.

That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.

A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.

(cherry picked from commit c524d33402)

Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go

That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.

(cherry picked from commit f061caa655)

Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.

(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f5)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca)

Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a2)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation

The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition

The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.

(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fd)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d3)

Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit da932152f1)

Pettier code to set the update time of comments

Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)

XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.

(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808d)

Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.

When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.

This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.

(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e)

Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests

Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.

The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c55)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43)

Conflicts:
	services/issue/issue.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade00)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb7698)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3d)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec7)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd)

[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)

[this is a follow-up to PR #764]

When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.

-----

Comment:

While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...

I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9)
(cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1da)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c4)
(cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686)
(cherry picked from commit 511c519c87)
(cherry picked from commit 2f0b4a8f61)
(cherry picked from commit fdd4da111c)

[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) do not use token= query param

See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/33439b733a

(cherry picked from commit c5139a75b9)
(cherry picked from commit c7b572c35d)
(cherry picked from commit aec7503ff6)
(cherry picked from commit 87c65f2a49)
(cherry picked from commit bd47ee33c2)
(cherry picked from commit f3dbd90a74)
2024-02-05 14:44:33 +01:00
Bram Hagens
50f55f11c4
Show whether a PR is WIP inside popups (#28975)
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2257

Draft status of a PR is currently not exposed by the API. This PR adds a
'draft' field to pull requests in the API, which is used to correctly
set the PR color/icon in a ContextPopup.

---

Before:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/5541521/72cbd30e-1175-4338-aa97-ac99c46c5118)

After:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/5541521/111c9eba-460e-4d57-bcca-23a151c3a4f1)
2024-02-04 22:37:45 +00:00
Adam Majer
d68a613ba8
Add support for sha256 repositories (#23894)
Currently only SHA1 repositories are supported by Gitea. This adds
support for alternate SHA256 with the additional aim of easier support
for additional hash types in the future.

Fixes: #13794
Limited by: https://github.com/go-git/go-git/issues/899
Depend on: #28138

<img width="776" alt="图片" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/5448c9a7-608e-4341-a149-5dd0069c9447">

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2024-01-19 17:05:02 +01:00
Jimmy Praet
5d3fdd1212
Add branch protection setting for ignoring stale approvals (#28498)
Fixes #27114.

* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.

For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.

So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-15 07:20:01 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
14ffdf6173
chore(api): support ignore password if login source type is LDAP for creating user API (#28491)
- Modify the `Password` field in `CreateUserOption` struct to remove the
`Required` tag
- Update the `v1_json.tmpl` template to include the `email` field and
remove the `password` field

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-12-19 02:32:45 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
16d15ce087
Fix package webhook (#27839)
Fix #23742

---------

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-10-31 04:43:38 +00:00
silverwind
5bf367f904
Restore warning commit status (#27504)
Partial revert of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25839. This
commit status is used by a number of external integrations, so I think
we should not remove it (See
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25839#issuecomment-1729002077).
This is a rare case where an existing migration needed to be alterted to
avoid data loss.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-10-08 22:16:06 +00:00
Nabapadma-sarker
8e23524b18
Fix PushEvent NullPointerException jenkinsci/github-plugin (#27203)
Fixes #27202
2023-09-24 19:02:47 +00:00
Daniel Kilimnik
0ee7cbf725
Fix push mirror, wrong timestamp format (#27153)
I noticed, that the push mirrors endpoint, is the only endpoint which
returns the times in long format rather than as time.Time().

I think the behavior should be consistent across the project.

----

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️

This PR changes the time format used in API responses for all
push_mirror endpoints which return a push mirror.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-09-23 12:15:05 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
8cd46024fd
refactor(API): refactor secret creation and update functionality (#26751)
According to the GitHub API Spec:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-or-update-an-organization-secret

Merge the Create and Update secret into a single API.

- Remove the `CreateSecretOption` struct and replace it with
`CreateOrUpdateSecretOption` in `modules/structs/secret.go`
- Update the `CreateOrUpdateOrgSecret` function in
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go` to use `CreateOrUpdateSecretOption`
instead of `UpdateSecretOption`
- Remove the `CreateOrgSecret` function in
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go` and replace it with
`CreateOrUpdateOrgSecret`
- Update the Swagger documentation in
`routers/api/v1/swagger/options.go` and `templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl`
to reflect the changes in the struct names and function names

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 13:08:19 +08:00
Earl Warren
a9ce570298
add Upload URL to release API (#26663)
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/580
- Return a `upload_field` to any release API response, which points to
the API URL for uploading new assets.
- Adds unit test.
- Adds integration testing to verify URL is returned correctly and that
upload endpoint actually works

---------

Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
2023-08-24 10:36:10 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
b62c8e7765
feat(API): update and delete secret for managing organization secrets (#26660)
- Add `UpdateSecret` function to modify org or user repo secret
- Add `DeleteSecret` function to delete secret from an organization
- Add `UpdateSecretOption` struct for updating secret options
- Add `UpdateOrgSecret` function to update a secret in an organization
- Add `DeleteOrgSecret` function to delete a secret in an organization

GitHub API

1. Update Org Secret:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-or-update-an-organization-secret
2. Delete Org Secret:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#delete-an-organization-secret

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-08-24 02:07:00 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
23addde28e
feat: implement organization secret creation API (#26566)
- Add a new `CreateSecretOption` struct for creating secrets
- Implement a `CreateOrgSecret` function to create a secret in an
organization
- Add a new route in `api.go` to handle the creation of organization
secrets
- Update the Swagger template to include the new `CreateOrgSecret` API
endpoint

---------

Signed-off-by: appleboy <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-08-22 11:20:34 +08:00
Yarden Shoham
16dee4f1b2
Add branch_filter to hooks API endpoints (#26599)
We now include the branch filler in the response.

- Closes #26591 

# Before

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/20454870/73933940-c1a7-4573-abae-f340b63028b2)

# After

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/20454870/3b3c4a85-0f7c-48c7-8617-def7a66c671d)

---------

Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-21 11:43:52 +00:00
yp05327
f6e7798405
Add link to job details and tooltip to commit status in repo list in dashboard (#26326)
Tooltip:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/237cb545-7844-424b-b995-1008eaaaedec)

Link to the target job:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/0c11a97f-6517-47f2-8773-f381488c084e)
2023-08-21 15:26:10 +08:00
Bo-Yi Wu
79d74d208f
Add API route to list org secrets (#26485)
- Add a new function `CountOrgSecrets` in the file
`models/secret/secret.go`
- Add a new file `modules/structs/secret.go`
- Add a new function `ListActionsSecrets` in the file
`routers/api/v1/api.go`
- Add a new file `routers/api/v1/org/action.go`
- Add a new function `listActionsSecrets` in the file
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go`

go-sdk: https://gitea.com/gitea/go-sdk/pulls/629

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-15 14:32:43 +02:00
puni9869
cafce3b4b5
Allow to archive labels (#26478)
## Archived labels 

This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.

## Changes

1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB

## Outsourced for the future

There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.

## Screenshots

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/208f95cd-42e4-4ed7-9a1f-cd2050a645d4)

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/746428e0-40bb-45b3-b992-85602feb371d)

Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-08-14 11:56:14 +02:00
caicandong
f2cc4daf60
Doc update swagger doc for POST /orgs/{org}/teams (#26155)
close #26111
2023-07-26 10:22:56 +00:00
caicandong
13359581df
refactor improve NoBetterThan (#26126)
- The `NoBetterThan` function can only handle comparisons between
"pending," "success," "error," and "failure." For any other comparison,
we directly return false. This prevents logic errors like the one in
#26121.
- The callers of the `NoBetterThan` function should also avoid making
incomparable calls.

---------

Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: puni9869 <80308335+puni9869@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-07-26 08:52:07 +00:00
JakobDev
6598d0291c
Allow Organisations to have a E-Mail (#25082)
Resolves #25057

This adds a E-Mail field to Organisations. The E-Mail is just shown on
the Profile when it is visited by a logged in User. The E-mail is not
used for something else.

**Screenshots:**

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15185051/a8d622b3-7278-4c08-984b-9c5ebfdb5471)

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15185051/6dcb1dd7-d04b-49eb-bc96-6582cfe9757b)

---------

Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <privat@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-25 08:26:27 +00:00
caicandong
840830b655
Remove commit status running and warning to align GitHub (#25839)
Fix #25776. Close #25826.

In the discussion of #25776, @wolfogre's suggestion was to remove the
commit status of `running` and `warning` to keep it consistent with
github.

references:
-
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/commits/statuses?apiVersion=2022-11-28#about-commit-statuses


## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️

So the commit status of Gitea will be consistent with GitHub, only
`pending`, `success`, `error` and `failure`, while `warning` and
`running` are not supported anymore.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-07-21 16:24:36 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
037c9895a7
Support copy protected branch from template repository (#25889)
Fix #14303
2023-07-21 12:32:47 +08:00
puni9869
d12ba978a7
Adding remaining enum for migration repo model type. (#26021) 2023-07-20 12:28:38 -05:00
jeremiepozzigithub
d7a8d09da0
Add file status for API "Get a single commit from a repository" (#16205) (#25831)
#16205 To obtain a closer behavior to the api from github, the status
(added, modified, removed) of a file should be available in addition to
the filename.
See github doc :

https://docs.github.com/fr/rest/commits/commits?apiVersion=2022-11-28#get-a-commit
2023-07-20 16:35:47 +08:00
wxiaoguang
236c645bf1
Refactor "Content" for file uploading (#25851)
Before: the concept "Content string" is used everywhere. It has some
problems:

1. Sometimes it means "base64 encoded content", sometimes it means "raw
binary content"
2. It doesn't work with large files, eg: uploading a 1G LFS file would
make Gitea process OOM

This PR does the refactoring: use "ContentReader" / "ContentBase64"
instead of "Content"

This PR is not breaking because the key in API JSON is still "content":
`` ContentBase64 string `json:"content"` ``
2023-07-18 18:14:47 +00:00
silverwind
88f835192d
Replace interface{} with any (#25686)
Result of running `perl -p -i -e 's#interface\{\}#any#g' **/*` and `make fmt`.

Basically the same [as golang did](2580d0e08d).
2023-07-04 18:36:08 +00:00
JakobDev
254a82842a
Add API for changing Avatars (#25369)
This adds an API for uploading and Deleting Avatars for of Users, Repos
and Organisations. I'm not sure, if this should also be added to the
Admin API.

Resolves #25344

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-29 23:22:55 +00:00
Jason Song
174213530d
Fix Permission in API returned repository struct (#25388)
The old code generates `structs.Repository.Permissions` with only
`access.Permission.AccessMode`, however, it should check the units too,
or the value could be incorrect. For example,
`structs.Repository.Permissions.Push` could be false even the doer has
write access to code unit.

Should fix
https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/issues/14059#issuecomment-1047961128
(Not reported by it, I just found it when I was looking into this bug)

---

Review tips:

The major changes are
- `modules/structs/repo.go`
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25388/files#diff-870406f6857117f8b03611c43fca0ab9ed6d6e76a2d0069a7c1f17e8fa9092f7
- `services/convert/repository.go`
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25388/files#diff-7736f6d2ae894c9edb7729a80ab89aa183b888a26a811a0c1fdebd18726a7101

And other changes are passive.
2023-06-22 13:08:08 +00:00
Denys Konovalov
eac1bddb8d
fix swagger documentation for multiple files API endpoint (#25110)
Fixes some issues with the swagger documentation for the new multiple
files API endpoint (#24887) which were overlooked when submitting the
original PR:

1. add some missing parameter descriptions
2. set correct `required` option for required parameters
3. change endpoint description to match it full functionality (every
kind of file modification is supported, not just creating and updating)
2023-06-07 23:49:58 +08:00
Denys Konovalov
275d4b7e3f
API endpoint for changing/creating/deleting multiple files (#24887)
This PR creates an API endpoint for creating/updating/deleting multiple
files in one API call similar to the solution provided by
[GitLab](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/commits.html#create-a-commit-with-multiple-files-and-actions).

To archive this, the CreateOrUpdateRepoFile and DeleteRepoFIle functions
in files service are unified into one function supporting multiple files
and actions.

Resolves #14619
2023-05-29 17:41:35 +08:00
JakobDev
aaa1094663
Add the ability to pin Issues (#24406)
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175.

## Screenshots

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123207-0aa39869-bb48-45c3-abe2-ba1e836046ec.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123297-152a16ea-a857-451d-9a42-61f2cd54dd75.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235640782-cbfe25ec-6254-479a-a3de-133e585d7a2d.png)

The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.

## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.

## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration

**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
谈笑风生间
309354c70e
New webhook trigger for receiving Pull Request review requests (#24481)
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321

Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.

Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.

After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
2023-05-24 22:06:27 -04:00
JakobDev
25dc1556cd
Add API for Label templates (#24602)
This adds API that allows getting the Label templates of the Gitea
Instance
2023-05-23 18:10:23 +08:00
wxiaoguang
f6e029e6c7
Make repo migration cancelable and fix various bugs (#24605)
Replace #12917

Close #24601
Close #12845


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/39378118-064d-40fb-8396-4579ebf33917)


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/faf37418-191c-46a6-90a8-353141e00e2d)


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/fdc8ee4d-125f-4737-9990-89bcdf9eb388)


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/9a3bd2c2-fe20-4011-81f0-990ed869d139)

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-11 08:25:46 +00:00
来自村里的小螃蟹
cd9a13ebb4
Create a branch directly from commit on the create branch API (#22956)
#### Added
- API: Create a branch directly from commit on the create branch API
- Added `old_ref_name` parameter to allow creating a new branch from a
specific commit, tag, or branch.
- Deprecated `old_branch_name` parameter in favor of the new
`old_ref_name` parameter.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-05-09 18:22:32 +08:00
JakobDev
36a5d4c2f3
Add API for gitignore templates (#22783)
This implements the [Gitignores template API of GitHub](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/gitignore?apiVersion=2022-11-28) in Gitea
2023-04-27 11:51:20 +08:00
JakobDev
c41bc4f127
Display when a repo was archived (#22664)
This adds the date a repo is archived to Gitea and shows it in the UI
and API. A feature, that GitHub has been [introduced
recently](https://github.blog/changelog/2022-11-23-repository-archive-date-now-shown-in-ui/).

I currently don't know how to correctly deal with the Date in the
template, as different languages have different ways of writing a date.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/234315187-7db5763e-d96e-4080-b894-9be178bfb6e1.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-04-26 10:46:26 -04:00
JakobDev
fb37eefa28
Add API for License templates (#23009)
This adds a API for getting License templates. This tries to be as close
to the [GitHub
API](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/licenses?apiVersion=2022-11-28) as
possible, but Gitea does not support all features that GitHub has. I
think they should been added, but this out f the scope of this PR. You
should merge #23006 before this PR for security reasons.
2023-04-26 02:08:28 -04:00
wxiaoguang
f20057271d
Fix Org edit page bugs: renaming detection, maxlength (#24161)
## Before

* The renaming detection is wrong (eg: pasting a new name into the input
doesn't trigger the detection)
* The renaming prompt layout is not good
* Some MaxSize/maxlength rules is missing


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/232379191-5d0f6d10-56ca-4cec-ac52-7f77b9cb4a8a.png)


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/232379234-3289373b-9ddb-4627-ae86-f4d74589fa0c.png)

## After

* Fix these problems


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/232379098-31c6fa21-c210-4e7f-a337-b38b99670835.png)
2023-04-17 11:35:57 -04:00
Zettat123
6b0df6d8da
Add activity feeds API (#23494)
Close #5666

Add APIs for getting activity feeds.
2023-04-04 21:35:31 +08:00
JakobDev
f384b13f1c
Implement Issue Config (#20956)
Closes #20955

This PR adds the possibility to disable blank Issues, when the Repo has
templates. This can be done by creating the file
`.gitea/issue_config.yaml` with the content `blank_issues_enabled` in
the Repo.
2023-03-28 14:22:07 -04:00
qwerty287
3cab9c6b0c
Add API to manage issue dependencies (#17935)
Adds API endpoints to manage issue/PR dependencies
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` List issues that are
blocked by this issue
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Block the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Unblock the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` List an
issue's dependencies
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Create a new
issue dependencies
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Remove an
issue dependency

Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/15393
Closes #22115

Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-03-28 13:23:25 -04:00
Brecht Van Lommel
84daddc2fa
Editor preview support for external renderers (#23333)
Remove `[repository.editor] PREVIEWABLE_FILE_MODES` setting that seemed
like it was intended to support this but did not work. Instead, whenever
viewing a file shows a preview, also have a Preview tab in the file
editor.

Add new `/markup` web and API endpoints with `comment`, `gfm`,
`markdown` and new `file` mode that uses a file path to determine the
renderer.

Remove `/markdown` web endpoint but keep the API for backwards and
GitHub compatibility.

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️

The `[repository.editor] PREVIEWABLE_FILE_MODES` setting was removed.
This setting served no practical purpose and was not working correctly.
Instead a preview tab is always shown in the file editor when supported.

---------

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-03-24 14:12:23 +08:00
James Cleverley-Prance
574d8fe6d6
Add absent repounits to create/edit repo API (#23500)
Adds the ability to enable/disable Actions, Packages and Releases from
the API, via the Edit and Get Repository API endpoints.
2023-03-16 12:30:42 -05:00
techknowlogick
d56bb74201
add admin API email endpoints (#22792)
add email endpoint to admin API to ensure API parity with admin
dashboard.
2023-03-14 03:54:40 -04:00
techknowlogick
03591f0f95
add user rename endpoint to admin api (#22789)
this is a simple endpoint that adds the ability to rename users to the
admin API.

Note: this is not in a mergeable state. It would be better if this was
handled by a PATCH/POST to the /api/v1/admin/users/{username} endpoint
and the username is modified.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-03-14 03:45:21 -04:00